Homo Erectus 340
1,015,106 99%
Homo Erectus 340
3 года назад
,jpeg/007/296/738/v2/320x180.208.jpg)
,jpeg/021/024/313/v2/320x180.213.jpg)
,jpeg/010/865/482/v2/320x180.226.jpg)
,jpeg/003/953/483/v2/320x180.209.jpg)
,jpeg/016/077/202/v2/320x180.222.jpg)
,jpeg/018/979/720/v2/320x180.240.jpg)
,jpeg/006/957/079/v2/320x180.230.jpg)
,jpeg/021/409/192/v2/320x180.277.jpg)
,jpeg/008/836/516/v2/320x180.264.jpg)
,jpeg/024/053/791/v2/320x180.235.jpg)
,jpeg/017/561/399/v2/320x180.249.jpg)
Not the people in the comments complaining about historic accuracy ajskdjfjgk
Ответить
They should have used make-up to cover the tattoos. I imagine those would be pretty uncommon in the 1860s. I find it immersion-breaking. Especially the porno-y placement.
Ответить
michael1962123 6 мес. назад
кому: BiBearBe : Two hot men. Had me going til the I saw the condom.
Ответить Исходный комментарий